Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv02570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ESTATE OF ABDALLAH EL DEEK et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02241
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF ABDALLAH EL DEEK, HEND AL RISHANI, RIYAD EL DEEK and others
Defendant:
ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN and IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
PRINCE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2023cv01352
Plaintiff:
NADINE PRINCE
Not Classified By Court:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRINCE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT
as 1:2022cv01825
Plaintiff:
NADINE PRINCE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
GRIVNOW v. BOWSER et al
as 1:2020cv02000
Defendant:
KAITLYN GIRARD, ERROL JOHNSON, D. SCOTT BARASH and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN K. GRIVNOW
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
GOODE v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2020cv01332
Defendant:
ROBERT HAWKINS, JOSEPH ONEK, NADINE WILBURN and others
Plaintiff:
JESSE P. GOODE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOBBY v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al
as 1:2018cv02873
Defendant:
EUGENE KINLOW, VENTRIS GIBSON, ALANA INTERIM and others
Plaintiff:
GERALDINE TALLEY HOBBY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02204
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
DYDZAK v. SCHWARZENEGGER et al
as 1:2012cv01534
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DAVID DYDZAK
Defendant:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, MARIA SHRIVER, ERIC H. HOLDER, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
