Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Paul Lietz, et al v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al
as 23-35603
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL LIETZ
Plaintiff:
SAKAHANN OUCH, VUTHA REN and L. S., a minor
Defendant / Appellee:
DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION, COLIN FINE, Special Agent, in his personal and/or official capacity, DAVID CLYDE, Special Agent, in his personal and/or official capacity and others
Defendant:
CANYON COUNTY, CANYON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CARY SALAZAR and others
Lietz, et al. v. Drug Enforcement Administration, et al.
as 1:2022cv00209
Plaintiff:
Paul Lietz, Sakahann Ouch, Vutha Ren and others
Defendant:
Drug Enforcement Administration, SA Colin Fine, SA David Clyde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wise v. Nampa Police Department
as 1:2020cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Wise
Defendant:
Nampa Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Nampa Police Department et al
as 1:2018cv00003
Plaintiff:
Richard Wilson
Defendant:
Nampa Police Department, Peper, Huston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clyne v. Ada County Sheriff et al
as 1:2017cv00492
Plaintiff:
Heath Thomas Clyne
Defendant:
Ada County Sheriff, Bannock County Sheriff, Nampa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hodock v. City of Nampa et al
as 1:2017cv00008
Plaintiff:
Robert Hodock
Defendant:
City of Nampa, Craig Kingsbury, Nampa Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Warden v. Cedillo et al
as 1:2014cv00292
Plaintiff:
Robert Levi Warden
Defendant:
Ricardo Cedillo, Chuck Hartman, Brice King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Caldwell, City of et al
as 2:2013cv00492
Plaintiff:
David Johnson , Connie Johnson and Aaron Johnson
Defendant:
Caldwell, City of, Caldwell Police Dept, Nampa, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
