Cases filed in District of Columbia
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2021cv01673
Defendant: ROY A. COOPER III, LEXIS PUBLISHING, NANCY S. NASH and others
Plaintiff: DAVID L. SMITH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WATSON v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02505
Plaintiff: NANCY WATSON and NANCY S. WATSON
Defendant: SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SOLOMON v. MALLINCKRODT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY et al
as 1:2017cv01827
Plaintiff: ROBERT J. SOLOMON
Defendant: MALLINCKRODT PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY , MARK TRUDEAU, MATTHEW K. HARBAUGH and others
Movant: NATALIE AMAYA and GREGORY SCHMIDT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
SCHOOLEY et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01376
Plaintiff: WILLIAM M SCHOOLEY , JIMMY N ADAMS, CAROL S ADAMS and others
Defendant: ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY and IRANIAN ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS AKA THE PASDARAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1602
SMITH v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv02123
Plaintiff: DAVID L. SMITH
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, TERRENCE W. BOYLE, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEARSON v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00454
Plaintiff: OMAR DEMETRIOUS PEARSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. TURK, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2008cv00048
Plaintiff: ANDRE LAMAR WOODY
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JAMES C. DEVER, III, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?