Cases 31 - 40 of 49
James River Insurance Company v. Retro, LLC et al
as 2:2015cv00465
Plaintiff:
James River Insurance Company
Defendant:
Retro, LLC, Mickey Phillips, Jessica Lynn Tompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lamonica v. Brown Nursing Home, LLC et al(CONSENT)
as 3:2015cv00326
Plaintiff:
Natalie Lamonica
Defendant:
Brown Nursing Home, LLC , Linda Casey and Employer's Claim Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Hinton v. Colvin
as 1:2013cv00418
Plaintiff:
Natalie Rogers Hinton
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Fulford v. Astrue
as 1:2013cv00099
Plaintiff:
Natalie Sue Fulford
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Beddingfield v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
as 4:2012cv03568
Plaintiff:
Natalie Beddingfield
Defendant:
Hartford Life & Accident Ins. Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 eri - Petition for removal - E.R.I.S.A.
Howard v. Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
as 1:2012cv03153
Defendant:
Honda Manufacturing of Alabama, LLC
Plaintiff:
Natalie Howard
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Williams v. United HealthCare of Alabama Inc
as 2:2012cv00988
Plaintiff:
Natalie Williams
Defendant:
United HealthCare of Alabama Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00733
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Mitchell et al v. Chartis Insurance et al
as 2:2011cv02533
Plaintiff:
Terrie Mitchell and Blankenship Harrelson, LLP
Defendant:
Chartis Insurance , National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh, P.A. , Natalie Orr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00338
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
