Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prison et al
as 1:2016cv24502
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prison , Thomas R. Kane, H.J. Marberry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2016cv23044
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Bureau of Prisons , J Hollingsworth, Dynan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Venkataram v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2015cv07143
Defendant:
Dynan, J Hollingsworth, Tracie Jenkins and others
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Natarajan Venkataram v. Office of Information Policy, et al
as 13-4404
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NATARAJAN VENKATARAM
Defendant - Appellee:
JANICE GALLI MCLEOD and OFFICE OF INFORMATION POLICY, U.S. Department of Justice
Venkataram v. United States of America
as 13-4495
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America
Venkataram v. United States of America
as 13-4279
Petitioner - Appellant:
Natarajan Venkataram
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
City of New York v. Venkataram
as 13-2558
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York
Defendant:
Rosa Abreu, Visualsoft Technologies, Limited and D.V.S. Raju
Defendant - Appellant:
Natarajan Venkataram
City of New York v. Venkataram
as 12-3416
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York
Defendant:
Rosa Abreu, Visualsoft Technologies, Limited and D.V.S. Raju
Defendant - Appellant:
Natarajan Venkataram
City of New York v. Venkataram
as 12-395
Plaintiff - Appellee:
City of New York
Defendant:
Rosa Abreu, Visualsoft Technologies, Limited and D.V.S. Raju
Defendant - Appellant:
Natarajan Venkataram
Venkataram v. United States Of America
as 1:2011cv08005
Plaintiff:
Natarajan Venkataram
Defendant:
United States Of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
