Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Respondent:
Pharmatech Laboratory, C.O.1 Bullick, Fidel Clark(c)TM and others
Petitioner:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kingston v. Clark(c)TM et al
as 1:2020cv00370
Defendant:
CO 1 L.M. McGinnis, Gregory Redden, CO 1 Kyler and others
Plaintiff:
Roalston Stevenson Kingston
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Rowe v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
as 14-3496
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY JOHN ROWE
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, PHILADELPHIA COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
ROWE v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 2:2013cv04094
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY JOHN ROWE
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA, COURT OF COMMON PLEAS-PHILADELPHIA COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Lusick v. David Lawrence, et al
as 11-1880
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID LAWRENCE, Court Adminstrator, JOSEPH H. EVERS, Prothonatary, VIVIAN T. MILLER, Clerk of Quarter Sessions and others
David Lusick v. David Lawrence, et al
as 10-1457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JOSEPH H. EVERS, Prothonatary, DAVID LAWRENCE, Prothonatary, NATASHA LOWE, Prothonatary and others
Defendant - Appellee:
DA PHILADELPHIA and HUGH J. BURNS, JR.
LUSICK v. LAWERENCE et al
as 2:2009cv05873
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant:
DAVID C. LAWERENCE, JOSEPH EVERS, VIVIAN T. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUSICK v. LAWERENCE et al
as 2:2009cv05581
Plaintiff:
DAVID GEORGE LUSICK
Defendant:
DAVID C. LAWERENCE, JOSEPH EVERS, VIVIAN T. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
