Cases 41 - 50 of 4,399
Lujan v. Quarterman et al
as 3:2010cv00012
Petitioner:
David Lujan
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and R. Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Pulido v. Quarterman
as 3:2009cv00462
Petitioner:
Jose Ines Pulido
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lopez v. Quarterman et al
as 4:2009cv00061
Petitioner:
Robert Lopez
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and Linda D. Carranza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simmonds v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv01017
Petitioner:
Gordon Ray Simmonds
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carl v. Quarterman et al
as 1:2009cv00978
Petitioner:
Richard Alan Carl
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman and S Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dietrich v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00967
Petitioner:
Daemond Dietrich
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neal v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00830
Petitioner:
Charles Boyd Neal
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Donoho v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00806
Petitioner:
David Allen Donoho
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bogany v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00903
Petitioner:
Robert Amos Bogany
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bird v. Quarterman et al
as 2:2009cv00277
Petitioner:
John Ronald Bird
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman, JM Garcia, Richard Crites, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
