Cases 11 - 20 of 3,626
Fields v. Quarterman
as 3:2013cv03418
Petitioner:
Emanual Deleon Fields
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Baker II v. Quarterman
as 4:2013cv00031
Petitioner:
Michael Paul Baker II
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2013cv00345
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, Director Baker, Federal Bureau of Investigations and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Damon Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villasana v. Quarterman
as 7:2012cv00199
Plaintiff:
Jose Luis Villasana
Defendant:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Headley v. Livingston et al
as 1:2012cv00467
Petitioner:
Brad Lee Headley
Respondent:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel Quarterman and Rick Thaler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ward v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 1:2012cv00210
Defendant:
Baker FNU, Gary Gomez, Brad Livingston and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Ward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LaPointe v. Quarterman
as 1:2012cv00089
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
James Thomas LaPointe
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramirez v. Guterrez et al
as 2:2011cv00408
Plaintiff:
Juan Ramirez, Jr.
Respondent:
Ernest H Guterrez, Jr, John Doe, Downoell Montooth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ezell v. Livingston et al
as 4:2011cv03571
Plaintiff:
Joseph Scott Ezell
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Nathaniel Quarterman, Wayne Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Solomon v. Quarterman
as 4:2011cv00103
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Petitioner:
Thomas Jefferson Solomon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
