Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WILLIAMS v. SMITH
as 5:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
QUENTONIO WILLIAMS
Defendant:
NATHANIEL SMITH, JR and OFFICER TALER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Crickmar et al
as 4:2016cv00027
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Scott Crickmar, Dueberry, Alisa Hammock and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Smith et al
as 5:2015cv00079
Plaintiff:
Corey Nathaniel Smith
Defendant:
Brian K. Smith, Edina Johnson and Department of Corrections, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CITIZENS BANK v. ACS/NES PROPERTIES INC et al
as 7:2012cv00088
Plaintiff:
CITIZENS BANK
Defendant:
ACS/NES PROPERTIES INC, ADONNA SMITH and NATHANIEL SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Smith v. Jackson et al
as 1:2011cv04082
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith, Jr.
Defendant:
Lester Jackson, Chatham County Superior Court, Richmond County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thurston v. Haynes et al
as 2:2011cv00108
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
Anthony Haynes and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Thurston v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 2:2010cv00138
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and H. Lappin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thurston v. Lappin et al
as 2:2009cv00177
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
Harley G. Lappin and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Thurston, Jr. v. Hickey et al
as 2:2009cv00046
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
Deborah A. Hickey and Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thurston v. The United States of America et al
as 2:2009cv00008
Petitioner:
Nathaniel Smith Thurston, Jr.
Respondent:
The United States of America and Federal Correctional Institution - Jesup
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
