Cases 1 - 4 of 4
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Reeves et al
as 3:2023cv00272
Plaintiff:
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Jackson City Branch of the NAACP and others
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Sean Tindell, Bo Luckey and others
Petitioner:
JXN Undivided Coalition, Mississippi Votes, PEOPLES ADVOCACY INSTITUTE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. State Board of Election Commissioners et al
as 3:2022cv00734
Plaintiff:
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People, Dr. Andrea Wesley, Dr. Joseph Wesley and others
Defendant:
State Board of Election Commissioners, Tate Reeves, Lynn Fitch and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Mississippi Republican Executive Committee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People et al v. Barbour et al THREE JUDGE PANEL: LEE, JOLLY, GUIROLA
as 3:2011cv00159
Plaintiff:
Mississippi State Conference of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People , Thomas Plunkett , Rod Woullard and others
Defendant:
Haley Barbour , Jim Hood , Delbert Hosemann and others
Intervenor:
Apportionment and Elections Committee of the Mississippi House of Representatives and Terry C. Burton
Intervenor_plaintiff:
MS Senate Democratic Caucus and Individual MS Democratic Senators
Intervenor_defendant:
Sidney Bondurant , Becky Currie and Mary Ann Stevens
Amicu:
The Mississippi Tea Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00025
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
