Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Lomasney v. Old National Bank
as 1:2024cv00359
Plaintiff:
Mark Daniel Lomasney
Defendant:
Old National Bank
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 1833 Fin. Inst. Reform, Recovery, and Enforcement Act
Schmidt Industries, Incorporated et al v. The Huntington National Bank
as 1:2022cv12543
Plaintiff:
Schmidt Industries, Incorporated and David Alan Schmidt
Defendant:
Huntington Bank and The Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Schmidt Industries, Incorporated et al v. The Huntington National Bank
as 1:2022cv10412
Plaintiff:
Schmidt Industries, Incorporated and David Alan Schmidt
Defendant:
The Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Shalawylo et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 2:2014cv14299
Plaintiff:
Brian Shalawylo and Lori Shalawylo
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., A National Banking Corporation and U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Black v. Department Stores National Bank
as 2:2013cv12311
Plaintiff:
Lawrence T Black
Defendant:
Department Stores National Bank
DAGS II, LLC et al v. Huntington National Bank, NA, The et al
as 1:2013cv00393
Plaintiff:
DAGS II, LLC and G2BK, LLC
Defendant:
Huntington National Bank, NA, The and Fourteen Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Holland v. Hanson's Window and Construction, Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv11993
Plaintiff:
Geraldine Holland
Defendant:
Hanson's Window and Construction, Incorporated and Wells Fargo Financial National Bank
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
El Camino Resources, Ltd. et al v. Huntington National Bank
as 1:2007cv00598
Plaintiff:
El Camino Resources, Ltd., El Camino Resources, Ltd., ePlus Group, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Huntington National Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
