Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Best et al v. Romec, Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv02335
Plaintiff:
Julian Best and Patricia Creft
Defendant:
Romec, Inc., Delta Homes, Inc., Joseph DiGregorio and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2607
Keisling v. Penn et al
as 1:2009cv02181
Plaintiff:
William Keisling
Defendant:
Richard Penn, John S. Kennedy, Sheryl Ann Dorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE COMPANY v. SUPERIOR MORTGAGE CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv05084
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL CITY MORTGAGE COMPANY
Defendant:
SUPERIOR MORTGAGE CORPORATION, JOHN H. CONEYS and MARC POLLICINO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Dietz et al v. National City Mortgage Company
as 1:2008cv01058
Plaintiff:
David M. Dietz, David M. Dietz, Jennifer C. Dietz and others
Defendant:
National City Mortgage Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National City Mortgage Company v. Kovacs
as 3:2008cv01001
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Dorothy Kovacs
Cause Of Action: Diversity
National City Mortgage Company v. Thomas
as 1:2008cv00921
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Horace Thomas
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
National City Mortgage Company v. Ramirez et al
as 3:2007cv02114
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Miguel A. Ramirez and Maria R. Ramirez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
National City Mortgage Company v. Stephen et al
as 3:2007cv02070
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Brian Stephen and Elaine K. Stephen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
National City Mortgage Company v. Diaz
as 3:2007cv01992
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Luis G. Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
National City Mortgage Company v. Gilbert et al
as 3:2007cv01705
Plaintiff:
National City Mortgage Company
Defendant:
Scott R. Gilbert and Tammy J. Gilbert
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
