Cases 1 - 6 of 6
RECREATIONAL FISHING ALLIANCE et al v. NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION et al
as 3:2015cv04596
Plaintiff:
RECREATIONAL FISHING ALLIANCE , THE FISHERMEN'S DOCK COOPERATIVE, INC. , JERSEY COAST ANGLERS ASSOCIATION, INC. and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION , FRANCE CORDOVA , OFFICE FOR COASTAL MANAGEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201
NJ Dept of Env Protection, et al v. National Science Foundation, et al
as 14-3243
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION and COMMISSIONER OF THE NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Defendant - Appellee:
NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION, FRANCE CORDOVA, as director of the National Science Foundation, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and others
Not Party - Proposed Amicus-Appellant:
CLEAN OCEAN ACTION
General Category S. Fisherman v. Secretary of United States Dep, et al
as 10-2341
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATEGORY SCALLOP FISHERMAN, General
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY, NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
John Van Salisbury v. USA, et al
as 09-1586
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN VAN SALISBURY, Personally and trading as F/V Major Expense
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and US DEPT OF COMMERCE, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
17 SCALLOP FISHERMEN v. GUTIERREZ et al
as 3:2008cv02264
Plaintiff:
17 SCALLOP FISHERMEN
Defendant:
CARLOS M. GUTIERREZ, THE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION and THE NATIONAL MARINE FISHERIES SERVICE
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SALISBURY v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2007cv04881
Plaintiff:
JOHN VAN SALISBURY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and SECRETARY, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA)
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
