Cases 11 - 19 of 19
LOVE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv01117
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
LERLINE LOVE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
VANCE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 1:2016cv01110
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
BETTY MICHELLE VANCE
Mediator:
PAUL D. COATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Robinson v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 5:2014cv00275
Plaintiff:
Ann Robinson
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Polite v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 5:2012cv00195
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Plaintiff:
Theresa Polite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BINGHAM, et al v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, et al
as 1:2011cv01153
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH PEAKS BINGHAM and ALBERT LAMONT BINGHAM
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY , NORTH CAROLINA RAILROAD COMPANY , NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Daniels v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation et al
as 5:2011cv00290
Plaintiff:
Nanette B. Daniels
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BEASLEY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, d/b/a AMTRAK
as 1:2011cv00287
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
RICK L. BEASLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BARRINGER v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 1:2010cv00068
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
LINDA S. BARRINGER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Turner v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation
as 3:2008cv00262
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Turner
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
