Cases 31 - 40 of 116
BAKSH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv09054
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
FAREED BAKSH
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
TIGUE v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv05468
Plaintiff:
MARTIN TIGUE
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BURTON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv05378
Plaintiff:
JORDAN BURTON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BYERS et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv01024
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND BYERS and TIFFANY BYERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIES v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00905
Plaintiff:
KEITH F DAVIES
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
LITGATTI v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2019cv00518
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LITGATTI
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) and AMTRAK
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 151
LONG v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv15803
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
THOMAS LONG
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
MCCLENDON v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv15353
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MCCLENDON
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
WILLIAMS v. CONNORS et al
as 2:2018cv14769
Defendant:
ABC CORP., JOHN DOE, AMTRAK and others
Plaintiff:
MR. ANTHONY WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAKSH v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as 2:2018cv14761
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Plaintiff:
FAREED BAKSH
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
