Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Kim et al v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
as MD/1:15-cv-01925
Plaintiff:
Jae-Yeon Kim and Sangyoon Nathan Park
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (AMTRAK)
Nixon v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as NYE/1:15-cv-03765
Plaintiff:
Tiffany M. Nixon
Defendant:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
MCCANN et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as PAE/2:15-cv-03259
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. MCCANN, JR. and AMY JO MCCANN
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
PHILLIPS et al v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
as PAE/2:15-cv-02694
Plaintiff:
BRUCE A. PHILLIPS and KALITA PHILLIPS
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Movant:
NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD and FEDERAL RAILROAD ADMINISTRATION
CAPPELLI v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK")
as 2:2014cv00813
Plaintiff:
ANN M. CAPPELLI
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK")
Thirdparty_defendant:
HEALTH MATS CO.
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION ("AMTRAK")
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AMTRAK v. U.S. Department of Labor, et al
as 13-2162
Petitioner:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation, (AMTRAK)
Respondent:
Acting United States Secretary of Labor, Seth Harris, in his official capacity and Administrative Review Board of the United States Department of Labor
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK) v. THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK et al
as 3:2013cv01557
Plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION (AMTRAK)
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK, PHILIP DUCHESNEAU, ROBERT SCOTT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
as 1:2011cv03959
Plaintiff:
National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak)
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Type:
Other Statutes
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
