Cases 1 - 10 of 55
Trenton Palmer v. FAA
as 23-1239
Petitioner:
Trenton Palmer
Respondent:
Federal Aviation Administration, Administrator and National Transportation Safety Board
Robert Nelson v. NTSB, et al
as 22-1079
Petitioner:
Robert Garrett Nelson
Respondent:
National Transportation Safety Board and Karl L. Schultz, Commandant, United States Coast Guard
Adam Norwitch v. Administrator of the Federal Aviation Admin, et al
as 21-1265
Petitioner:
Adam S. Norwitch
Respondent:
Administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board
David Tushin v. FAA, et al
as 21-1206
Petitioner:
David Tushin
Respondent:
Stephen Dickson, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration and National Transportation Safety Board
Stephen Dickson v. Ydil Pham, et al
as 21-1083
Respondent:
Ydil W. Pham and National Transportation Safety Board
Petitioner:
Stephen Dickson, Administrator, Federal Aviation Administration
Ydil Pham v. NTSB, et al
as 21-1062
Respondent:
National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration
Petitioner:
Ydil W. Pham
Kevin Pinger v. FAA, et al
as 20-1481
Respondent:
National Transportation Safety Board and Federal Aviation Administration
Petitioner:
Kevin Richard Pinger
DAHL v. DICKSON et al
as 1:2019cv03267
Defendant:
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD (NTSB) and STEPHEN DICKSON
Not Yet Classified:
Administrator Stephen Dickson
Plaintiff:
Troy M. Dahl
Cause Of Action: 10 U.S.C. § 1006
SCOTT v. CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY et al
as 1:2018cv00264
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. SCOTT
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, NATIONAL REAGAN AIRPORT, PENTAGON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENKELMEN v. HUERTA et al
as 1:2016cv02340
Petitioner:
MICHAEL HENKELMEN
Respondent:
MICHAEL HUERTA and NATIONAL TRANSPORTATION SAFETY BOARD
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
