Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Shibahara v. State of Oregon et al
as 6:2023cv01272
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth K. Shibahara
Defendant:
State of Oregon, Holly Catalina, Laura Ramirez Marin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Navarro v. Jacquez
as 3:2023cv00976
Petitioner:
Rosendo Garcia Navarro
Respondent:
Warden DeWayne Hendrix and Warden Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv01593
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reyes et al v. SK Hoff Construction, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01773
Defendant:
Unique Construction Inc., SD Drywall and Insulation, LLC, Saul Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
Aurelio Parra, Christian Sosa and Julio Reyes
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Navarro-Gutierrez v. USA
as 3:2018cv00972
Petitioner:
Victor Hugo Navarro-Gutierrez
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Green v. Peters et al
as 2:2018cv00134
Defendant:
Brigitte Amsbury, Alifonso Cornejo, Jose Navarro and others
Plaintiff:
James D. Green
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Navarro-Paredes v. Premo
as 6:2016cv00812
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Navarro-Paredes
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Navarro-Paredes v. Premo
as 6:2016cv00229
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Navarro-Paredes
Respondent:
Jeff Premo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00368
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
