Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Neagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2021cv01664
Petitioner:
Darby Neagle
Respondent:
State of Nevada and Calvin Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Neagle v. Johnson
as 2:2021cv00225
Respondent:
Calvin Johnson and State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Darby Neagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller v. Steinheimer, et al
as 3:2016cv00317
Defendant:
Richard A. Gammick, Christopher J. Hicks, Travis Look and others
Plaintiff:
Martin Karl Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivero v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2008cv00286
Plaintiff:
Damien Rivero
Defendant:
E. K. McDaniel, A. Endel, Robert Chambliss and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NOT USED
as 2:2008cv01000
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Padilla v. State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00419
Plaintiff:
Raymond Padilla
Defendant:
State of Nevada in rel. The Nevada Department of Corrections, Jim Gibbons, Kenny Guinn and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davitt v. Viderine et al
as 3:2007cv00578
Plaintiff:
Michael Davitt
Defendant:
Viderine, Brooks, Hendrix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Bryant et al
as 3:2007cv00569
Plaintiff:
George Scott
Defendant:
Ronald Bryant, Arthur Neagle, Ator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
L. Seville Parks v. McDaniel et al
as 3:2007cv00557
Plaintiff:
L. Seville Parks
Defendant:
E. K. McDaniel, Debra Brooks, Adam Endel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cohen v. State Of Nevada et al
as 3:2007cv00043
Plaintiff:
Russell Cohen
Defendant:
State Of Nevada, Department of Corrections, Nevada, FNU Aten and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
