Cases
United States of America v. Thomas
as 24-726
Defendant: NEGUS THOMAS, JERKENO WALLACE, LAVAR JACKSON and others
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 24-196
Defendant: NEGUS THOMAS, LAVAR JACKSON, KAVOHN TAYLOR and others
Defendant / Appellant: JERKENO WALLACE and Uptown
Not Yet Classified: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Thomas v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv01908
Respondent: USA
Petitioner: Negus Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Thomas
as 17-1190
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E. and Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 17-1196
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown
Thomas v. USA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2015cv01602
Petitioner: Negus Thomas
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Thomas (Thomas)
as 14-1980
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E.
United States of America v. Thomas (Wallace)
as 14-1728
Appellee USA: United States of America
Defendant: Kelvin Coleman, Kimberly Cruze, Lavar Jackson, AKA Smokey and others
Defendant - Appellant: Jerkeno Wallace, AKA Uptown and Negus Thomas, AKA Brown Eyes, AKA B.E.
Thomas v. Holder We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv01001
Petitioner: Negus Thomas
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?