Cases 1 - 10 of 355
Parrish, Christopher Neil v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2024cv14085
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Banner, Antonio L. v. Jones et al
as 2:2024cv14080
Plaintiff:
Antonio Leon Banner
Defendant:
Tim Jones, Neil Lettman and Employees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Parrish v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14401
Plaintiff:
Christopher Neil Parrish
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Simpson v. Donahue et al
as 1:2023cv05226
Plaintiff:
Irvin Lamar Simpson
Defendant:
Sean R Donahue, Neil Butler, Bobby Cunningham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Alfred v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13263
Petitioner / Appellant:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED
Respondent / Appellee:
RICKY D. DIXON and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Restricted Filer - Alfred v. Dixon
as 1:2023cv23187
Plaintiff:
JERRY NEIL ALFRED and Jerry Neil Restricted Filer - Alfred
Defendant:
Antony Blinken and Secretary Ricky D Dixon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv18283
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CARLOS v. NEIL
as 3:2023cv16485
Plaintiff:
COGDELL CARLOS and CARLOS COGDELL
Defendant:
NEIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Littlejohn v. Shoultz et al
as 1:2023cv02659
Plaintiff:
Timothy Littlejohn
Defendant:
Deputy Shoultz, Boyette, Craig Oupno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GLENN v. AVALA et al
as 5:2023cv00146
Plaintiff:
JOE NEIL GLENN, JR
Defendant:
AVALA and NUNEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
