Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Employment)
Higley v. State of Utah et al
as 2:2022cv00289
Plaintiff:
Mark Lee Higley
Defendant:
State of Utah, Spencer Cox, Tooele County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv00798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Palacios v. Salt Lake City Police Department et al
as 2:2020cv00714
Defendant:
Salt Lake City Police Department, Kevin Fortuna, Neil Iversen and others
Plaintiff:
Elsa Karina Palacios
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Civil Rights Act
Irons v. Skougard et al
as 1:2014cv00104
Plaintiff:
Kevin Irons
Defendant:
Neil Skougard, Arnold Van Dugteren, FNU Arrowsmith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Excalibur Industries et al v. Jewell et al
as 2:2013cv00928
Plaintiff:
Excalibur Industries and Raymond L. Ridge
Defendant:
Sally Jewell, Tommy Beaudreau, Ken Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Webb v. Weber County Government et al
as 1:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
David Webb
Defendant:
Weber County Government, Craig L. Dearden, Jan M. Zogmaister and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Estate of James D. Redd, M.D. v. Love et al
as 2:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
Estate of James D. Redd, M.D.
Defendant:
Daniel Love, Dan Barnes, Brent Range and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Gardner v. Ogden City et al
as 1:2011cv00031
Plaintiff:
Robert Gardner
Defendant:
Ogden City , Matthew Godfrey , Bart Blair and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Travis v. Benson et al
as 2:2009cv01095
Plaintiff:
Bryan L. Travis
Defendant:
Dee Benson, Tena Campbell, Paul Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
