Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Ramos Duarte v. USA - 2255
as 8:2020cv00800
Defendant:
USA - 2255
Petitioner:
Nery Gustavo Ramos Duarte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Molina et al v. Joe Squared, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv03509
Plaintiff:
Gerson Molina , Maria Padron-Moreno , Jose E Marroquin-Perez and others
Defendant:
Joe Squared, LLC , Edwardsen Brothers, LLC and Joseph P. Edwardsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Medina et al v. D. Otero Paving, LLC et al
as 8:2016cv00589
Plaintiff:
Rigoberto Medina , Adan Reyes , Nery Hernandez and others
Defendant:
D. Otero Paving, LLC and Douglas A. Otero-Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Trujillo et al v. International Progreso Market #3, #4 d/b/a El Progreso et al
as 8:2015cv02561
Plaintiff:
Ana Trujillo , Neri Donis , Rosa E Martinez and others
Defendant:
International Progreso Market #3, #4 d/b/a El Progreso , Ramos Market, Inc , Maria Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Duarte v. USA-2255
as 8:2015cv02159
Petitioner:
Nery Gustavo Ramos Duarte
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Vallejo v. APT Systems, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03317
Plaintiff:
Neris Raul Vallejo
Defendant:
APT Systems, Inc., APT Systems, LLC and Joseph Curtis Stricker
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Neri et al v. USA
as 1:2010cv00872
Plaintiff:
Tasha Neri and Roger Neri
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Bruno v. Nery et al
as 1:2009cv03086
Plaintiff:
Michael Bruno
Defendant:
Tony V. Nery, Brian Smith, Day Hoff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Medrano et al v. Williams Mechanical Contracting Corporation et al
as 8:2008cv00471
Plaintiff:
Efren Medrano, Efren Medrano, Jorge Castillo and others
Defendant:
Williams Mechanical Contracting Corporation, Design Build Mechanical Corp. and Scottie Williams
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
