Cases 1 - 10 of 48
Omar Gonzalez et al v. American Honda Motor Company Inc
as 2:2023cv03082
Plaintiff:
Omar Gonzalez and Johnathan Nesbitt
Defendant:
American Honda Motor Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Nesbitt v. Kijakazi
as 5:2022cv05548
Plaintiff:
Troy Nesbitt
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Gerald Ashford v. James Hill et al
as 5:2022cv00846
Plaintiff:
Gerald Ashford
Defendant:
James Hill, T. Lee, B. Castorena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Nesbitt v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv09018
Plaintiff:
Bret Nesbitt
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as PAX Labs, Inc. formerly doing business as Ploom Inc., Altria Group, Inc., Philip Morris USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020cv01788
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Seto et al v. County of San Joaquin
as 2:2020at00872
Plaintiff:
Nick Taiariol, Shawn Cannon, Daniel Levin and others
Defendant:
County of San Joaquin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Nesbitt v. Saul, Commissioner of SSA
as 3:2020cv04946
Plaintiff:
Troy Nesbitt
Defendant:
Andrew Saul, Commissioner of SSA and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Francisco Xavier Carbajal v. Food Services et al
as 5:2020cv01029
Defendant:
T. Nesbitt, B. Lemaster, T. Le and others
Plaintiff:
Francisco Xavier Carbajal, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nesbitt v. Monsanto Company et al
as 3:2020cv03068
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1-50 and Monsanto Company
Plaintiff:
John T. Nesbitt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
