Cases 31 - 40 of 84
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00138
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00640
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2016cv00125
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Magnetic v. State of Nevada et al
as 2:2016cv00639
Defendant:
Aramark, David Barker, Linda Bell and others
Plaintiff:
Infinite Master Magnetic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00296
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Mayo v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2015cv01906
Defendant:
Adams, Nevada Department of Corrections, Southern Desert Correctional Center and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of Nevada, ex rel
as 3:2015cv00494
Defendant:
James Benedetti, Katherine Cortez Masto, Greg Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Tonja Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Tagle v. State of Nevada et al
as 3:2015cv00445
Defendant:
Kathleen Homers, C. Lilinfel, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Tagle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01588
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv01441
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
