Cases 1 - 10 of 22
NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP et al v. THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2021cv12306
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY, T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251 Telecommunications Act of 1996 - Interconnection
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. CE-PRO BIKES, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00859
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant:
CE-PRO BIKES, LLC doing business as PRO BIKE+ RUN and CE MONROEVILLE22, LP
Cross Defendant:
CE-PRO BIKES, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. COGECO US (PENN) LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00727
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Defendant:
COGECO US (PENN) LLC doing business as BREEZELINE, MAICOM SOLUTIONS, LLC doing business as MAICOM LLC and STONEMILE GROUP, LLC
Cross Defendant:
L&J ERECTION, INC., RUTHRAUFF SERVICE, LLC, COGECO US (PENN) LLC and others
Cross Claimant:
CONTROLS SERVICE & ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC.
Counter Defendant:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
as 2:2021cv00443
Defendant:
CITY OF PITTSBURGH, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC doing business as AT&T MOBILITY
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 U.S.C.A. Cable Communications Policy Act
T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC et al v. NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS et al
as 2:2021cv12302
Defendant:
ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT OF THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY, NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP D/B/A VERIZON WIRELESS and THE TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD, NEW JERSEY
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC D/B/A AT&T MOBILITY and T-MOBILE NORTHEAST LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 251
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC v. THE CITY OF NEW CASTLE et al
as 2:2020cv00386
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW CASTLE and CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF NEW CASTLE
Plaintiff:
NEW CINGULAR WIRELESS PCS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AT&T Capital Services, Inc. et al v. Geisenberger et al
as 1:2019cv02238
Plaintiff:
The Ohio Bell Telephone Company, AT&T Mobility Supply, LLC, AT&T NCWS Holdings, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Richard J. Geisenberger, Brenda R. Mayrack and Michelle M. (Whitaker) Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al v. Delchi Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01891
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Kenneth H. Moore, NNVI Investment LLC, Lillian P. Lapa and others
Plaintiff:
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
3Rd Party Defendant:
AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Delchi Corporation et al v. AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01901
Plaintiff:
Edward Friz, Richard Monnoyer, Frank Borreani and others
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC, New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC and AT&T Mobility LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Kalra et al v. AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC et al
as 1:2019cv01897
Plaintiff:
Om Kalra and J&J Cellcom
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Wireless Operations Holdings LLC, AT&T Mobility LLC and New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC
Intervenor:
United States
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
