Cases 1 - 10 of 36
(PC) Petillo v. CSP SAC New Folsom Prison
as 2:2021cv01471
Plaintiff:
Dennis Petillo and Dennis Petillo, Jr.
Defendant:
CSP SAC New Folsom Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris v. CSP-Sacramento et al
as 2:2017cv02286
Plaintiff:
Orville M. Morris
Defendant:
CSP-Sacramento, B. McCulloch, D. Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Antoine Barnes v. New Folsom State Prison Warden
as 17-56521
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANTOINE DESHAWN BARNES
Respondent - Appellee:
NEW FOLSOM STATE PRISON WARDEN
Morris v. CSP-Sacramento et al
as 3:2017cv05608
Plaintiff:
Orville M. Morris
Defendant:
CSP-Sacramento, B. McCulloch, D. Roth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Troy Anderson v. Scott Kernan, et al
as 17-16420
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TROY J. ANDERSON
Defendant - Appellee:
SCOTT KERNAN, Secretary of CDCR, EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., for the State of California, SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, Warden and others
Antoine Deshawn Barnes v. New Folsom State Prison
as 2:2017cv03670
Petitioner:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Respondent:
New Folsom State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. New Folsom State Prison
as 2:2017cv00912
Petitioner:
Antoine Deshawn Barnes
Respondent:
New Folsom State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Randall v. New Folsom Facility ABC
as 2:2015cv02599
Plaintiff:
Virgil Douglas Randall
Defendant:
New Folsom Facility ABC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barger v. San Francisco, CA
as 3:2015cv01671
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Barger
Defendant:
San Francisco, CA, Law Library Employees, Pelican Bay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barger v. Trust Office, et al
as 3:2015cv01626
Plaintiff:
Gary Dale Barger
Defendant:
Trust Office, Director of OPS of CDCR, Ventura County Superior Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
