Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Helen Mubarak-Assad v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2013cv01142
Defendant:
Aisan Industry Co., Ltd., Denso International America Inc, Franklin Precision Industry, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Helen Mubarak-Assad
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Barbara Iglesias v. Toyota Motor Corporation et al
as 8:2010cv00602
Defendant:
CTS Corporation, Doe Defendants 1 through 10, Lexus Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Iglesias and Barbara Iglesias
Daniel D Lee v. Toyota Motor North America, Inc., et al
as 8:2010cv00607
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Lee, Jean Velliquette and Carole R. Young
Defendant:
New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Toyota Motor Corporation, Toyota Motor Engineering & Manufacturing North America, Inc. and others
Marigny v. New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./("NUMMI")/Local Union (UAW)
as 3:2010cv01800
Defendant:
New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./("NUMMI") and Local Union (UAW)
Plaintiff:
Glenn P. Marigny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Toyota Motor Corp. Unintended Acceleration Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation
as 8:2010ml02151
Plaintiff:
Vilsaint Georges, Willette Riley, Narcisso Pimentel and others
Defendant:
Doe Trucking Company, New United Motor Manufacturing Inc, Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Indiana, Inc. and others
Special Master:
John K Trotter, Patrick A Juneau and Steven Stone
Petitioner:
Estate of Estelle Gottesman, Tanya Ross, Cassandra McNair-Stepney and others
Not Classified By Court:
Brenda Kaycee Howell Nimota, Housan Huang, Margaret Strohlein and others
Interested Party:
Betsy Benjaminson, Brevard County Board of County Commissioners, Denso Corporation and others
3Rd Party Defendant:
Michael Barr and Larry W. Jenkins
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Ohio Bureau of Workers Compensation
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
Sean Kane and Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
Intervenor:
Wolverine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Benefit Plan et al v. Administrative Committee For The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Benefit Plan et al
as 3:2010cv00898
Plaintiff:
The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Benefit Plan, The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Benefit Plan, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation and others
Defendant:
Administrative Committee For The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Benefit Plan, Savings and Retirement Committee and New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Cannon v. The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Bebefit Plan
as 3:2010cv00607
Plaintiff:
David Cannon and David Cannon
Defendant:
The New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc./UAW Hourly Defined Bebefit Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits
Dumas v New United Motor Manufacturing , Inc
as 4:2009cv05290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dumas
Defendant:
New United Motor Manufacturing , Inc. and Garrett Emery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185
Dumas v New United Motor Manufacturing , Inc
as 3:2009cv05290
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dumas
Defendant:
New United Motor Manufacturing , Inc. and Garrett Emery
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 185 Labor/Mgt. Relations (Contracts)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
