Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv01644
Plaintiff:
Michael Mulgrew, Afl-Cio, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00367
Plaintiff:
New Yorkers Against Congestion Pricing Tax, Danny Buzzetta, Dr. Gregor Winkel and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Mulgrew et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MULGREW, AFL-CIO, Vito J. Fossella and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4321 Review of Agency Action-Environment
Diaz v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Deve
as 23-397
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Lydia Gonzalez Diaz, on behalf of a class of similarly situated tenants of the New York City Housing Authority at Harlem River Houses, Vanessa Walsh, on behalf of a class of similarly situated tenants of the New York City Housing Authority at Harlem River Houses, Nina Crawford, on behalf of a class of similarly situated tenants of the New York City Housing Authority at Harlem River Houses and others
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Housing Authority, Harlem River Perservation LLC and others
Diaz et al v. United States Department of Housing and Urban Development et al
as 1:2022cv02051
Plaintiff:
Lydia Gonzalez Diaz, Vanessa Walsh, Nina Crawford and others
Defendant:
United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, New York City Housing Authority, Harlem River Preservation LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1437 U.S. Housing Act of 1937
NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION v. BECERRA
as 1:2021cv03120
Plaintiff:
NEW YORK CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
Defendant:
XAVIER BECERRA
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
S.B. et al v. New York City Department of Education
as 1:2021cv09139
Plaintiff:
Sally Bonython, Acelin Wiesehahn, S. B. and others
Defendant:
new york city department of education
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
MAZON: A Jewish Response to Hunger et al v. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services et al
as 1:2021cv00475
Defendant:
Secretary of Veterans Affairs, currently Robert Wilkie, Secretary of Homeland Security, currently identified as Peter T. Gaynor in an acting capacity, Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, currently Dr. Ben Carson and others
Plaintiff:
Ark of Freedom Alliance, American Atheists, Hindu American Foundation and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
American Medical Association et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00318
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, United States Department of Health & Human Services, Office of Population Affairs and others
Plaintiff:
American Medical Association, Michele P. Megregian, C.N.M., Thomas N. Ewing, M.D. and others
Amicus Curiae:
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, City of Chicago and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of Oregon et al v. Azar et al
as 6:2019cv00317
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Alex M. Azar, II, Diane Foley, United States Department of Health and Human Services and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oregon Medical Association, Planned Parenthood of Southwestern Oregon, American Medical Association and others
Amicus Curiae:
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation, Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law, City of Los Angeles and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
