Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv06294
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Dua et al v. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation et al
as 1:2010cv05185
Plaintiff:
Diane I. Dua , Joel Kaye , Bryan Close and others
Defendant:
New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Adrien Benepe, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hernandez v. Wifelife Conservation Society et al
as 1:2010cv04916
Plaintiff:
Modesto Hernandez
Defendant:
Wifelife Conservation Society and New York City Department of Parks and Recreation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Lederman et al v. New York City Department of Parks and Recreation et al
as 1:2010cv04800
Plaintiff:
Robert Lederman and Jack Nesbitt
Defendant:
New York City Department of Parks and Recreation, Adrian Benepe, City of New York and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander Alhovsky v. Christopher Paul
as 10-63
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Alexander Alhovsky
Defendant:
Christopher Paul, Police Officer, Christopher Paul, Police Officer, New York City Police Department, Detectives 1-5 and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Ryan, Jose Alfonso and Panuccio
Appellee:
Timothy Morenzoni, NYPD Police Officer and Timothy Gaven
Depietro v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2009cv00932
Plaintiff:
John Depietro
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Department of Buildings, New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv04474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Alhovsky v. Ryan et al
as 1:2007cv07628
Plaintiff:
Alexander Alhovsky
Defendant:
Thomas Ryan, New York City Police Department Detectives 1-5, New York City Police Department Officers 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
