Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Lacen et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv07371
Plaintiff:
Mildred Lacen, Alexis Robinson, Jeremiah Martinez and others
Defendant:
corp CITY OF NEW YORK, New York Police Department, NYPD John Does 1 through 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The City of New York
as 20-1442
Defendant:
Lauren Stoia, Assistant District Attorney, Blaine Fogg, President, Gene Conway, Attorney and others
Defendant / Appellee:
New York Police Officer John Doe #2, New York Police Officer Gelphin Gomez, Shield #04967, Angie Godoy, Assistant District Attorney of the County of New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kareem Omar Jones
Bacchus v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv04264
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Bacchus
Defendant:
City of New York, City of New York Police Officer Georin Duran, City of New York Police Officer Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garris-Rivers v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2013cv09034
Plaintiff:
Tamiko Garris-Rivers
Defendant:
The City Of New York, The Long Island Rail Road, The Metropolitan Transportation Authority and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson et al v. City of New York Police Officers John Doe #1-10
as 7:2013cv01514
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dickerson , Luis Torres , Jesse Scott and others
Defendant:
City of New York Police Officers John Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dickerson et al v. City of New York Police Officers John Doe #1-10
as 1:2013cv01514
Plaintiff:
Theodore Dickerson , Luis Torres , Jesse Scott and others
Defendant:
City of New York Police Officers John Doe #1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morales v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv06743
Plaintiff:
Rebecca Morales
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York Police Department and New York Police Officer John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
