Cases 1 - 4 of 4
Robert Fernicola v. GPO Federal Credit Union
as 09-1833
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent and DONNA J. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent
Defendant - Appellee:
GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, BANK OF AMERICA, GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, CEO John Prumo, VP Gary Roback, GOP Branch Manager Sherry Morasco and others
Robert Fernicola, et al v. GPO, et al
as 09-5149
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Robert Fernicola and Donna Fernicola
Defendant - Appellee:
Government Printing Office, Federal Credit Union, Bank of America, HSBC Bank and others
Robert Fernicola v. GPO Federal Credit Union
as 09-1132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT E. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent and DONNA J. FERNICOLA, as legal owners of certain bonds, accounts, trust, delegation investment management agreements designated as treasury tax and loan depositaries and federal tax depositaries that are approved paying agent
Defendant - Appellee:
GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, BANK OF AMERICA, GPO FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, CEO John Prumo, VP Gary Roback, GOP Branch Manager Sherry Morasco and others
Fernicola et al v. GPO Federal Credit Union et al
as 4:2008cv01790
Plaintiff:
Robert E Fernicola and Donna J Fernicola
Defendant:
GPO Federal Credit Union, Bank of America, HSBC Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
