Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hill v. Nichols et al
as 2:2021cv01679
Plaintiff:
Rickie Hill
Defendant:
Nichols, Prevost and Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nichols v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2021cv01478
Plaintiff:
Joshua Nichols
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Caseworker Ritz and Warden Brian Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harden et al v. NDOC HDSP Deputy Director et al
as 2:2017cv01826
Defendant:
Associate Warden, Classification Specialist, Deputy warden and others
Plaintiff:
Harold D Harden, Mark Johnas Jr, Calvin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Legg v. Nichols et al
as 3:2016cv00198
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Sheryl Foster, Nevada Inspector Generals Office and others
Plaintiff:
Dean R Legg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rimer v. State of Nevada ex rel Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2014cv00889
Defendant:
Linda Adams, Dr. Romeo Aranas, Dr. Joyce Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Rimer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Baca et al
as 3:2013cv00671
Respondent:
Isidro Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Colbert F. Nichols
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DuBois v. Washoe County Jail
as 3:2012cv00415
Plaintiff:
Matthew A. DuBois
Defendant:
M. Hahn, Medical Director/Supevisor, J. Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cochrane v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
as 3:2011cv00092
Defendant:
Sgt. D. Aspaiszu, Clark County and Officials, Doug Gillispie and others
Plaintiff:
Terry R. Cochrane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nichols v. Clark County Detention Center et al
as 2:2009cv01698
Plaintiff:
Colbert F. Nichols
Defendant:
Clark County Detention Center and Robert Bannister
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
