Cases 31 - 40 of 68
Rodriguez v. Reeves County Detention Center I & II et al
as 1:2014cv06052
Plaintiff:
Luis Ricardo Rodriguez
Defendant:
Reeves County Detention Center I & II, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Major Reyes at R.C.D.C. I & II and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trueheart v. Cipollini et al
as 1:2014cv00830
Plaintiff:
Nathan Trueheart
Defendant:
T. Cipollini, B. Mann, Nicholes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Yelich et al
as 9:2013cv00682
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brown
Defendant:
B. Yelich, Albert Prack, D. Phelix and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Frederick et al
as 9:2013cv00605
Plaintiff:
Harold J. Scott
Defendant:
Peter Frederick, J. Facteau, Edna Aiken and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Ciric et al
as 1:2013cv03277
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Diaz
Defendant:
Steven Ciric, Nancy Nichols-Goldstein, Michael F. Hogan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
White v. Williams et al
as 9:2012cv01775
Plaintiff:
John White
Defendant:
Patricia L. Williams, Richard MacWilliams, C. Demers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAllister v. Mann et al
as 1:2012cv06568
Plaintiff:
Owen Q. McAllister, Sr.
Defendant:
B. Mann, L. Nichols, Conley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Goheens et al
as 9:2012cv00737
Plaintiff:
Calvin D. Jones, Jr
Defendant:
Amy Goheens, Laurie Goddeau, Russell A. Perdue and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Leadingham v. Michigan of Correction SCDD Supervisor et al
as 1:2012cv00616
Plaintiff:
Brian Kenneth Leadingham
Defendant:
Michigan of Correction SCDD Supervisor, Rebca Springett, Brigget Grump and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phelan v. Lichva et al
as 9:2011cv00315
Plaintiff:
Kenneth J. Phelan
Defendant:
Nichole Lichva, Christina Calabrese, Judge Wagner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
