Cases 11 - 20 of 358
Oscar Ibarra v. Nick Ludwick
as 19-2024
Respondent / Appellee:
Nick Ludwick
Petitioner / Appellant:
Oscar Ibarra
Edwards v. Whalen et al
as 4:2019cv00137
Defendant:
Chris Tripp, Rebecca Bowker, Douglas Bolton and others
Plaintiff:
William Simpson Edwards
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Schierbrock et al
as 4:2018cv00237
Defendant:
Katrina Carter, Randy Gibbs, Mike Schierbrock and others
Interested Party:
William A Hill
Plaintiff:
Keith Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Cox et al
as 2:2018cv11255
Plaintiff:
Ernest Joseph Davis
Defendant:
Mike Cox, Patricia Caruso, Norma Killough and others
Mark Bitzan v. Jerry Bartruff, et al
as 17-2687
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mark Bitzan
Plaintiff:
Cassandra Zent
Defendant - Appellee:
Jerry Bartruff, IDOC Director, John Baldwin, Former IDOC Director, Sheryl Dahm, Assistant IDOC Deputy Director and others
Defendant:
Debbie Nichols, ISP Former A/W Security, Jay Nelson, IDOC Religious Coordinator, Statewide Religion Review Committee and others
Santos Rosales-Martinez v. Nick Ludwick
as 17-1910
Petitioner - Appellant:
Santos Rosales-Martinez
Respondent - Appellee:
Nick Ludwick, Warden
Hardin v. Bartruff et al
as 4:2017cv00124
Plaintiff:
Romeo Hardin
Defendant:
Jerry Bartruff, Sheryl Dahm, Nick Ludwick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schreiber v. Iowa Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2017cv00043
Plaintiff:
Benjamin E Schreiber
Defendant:
Iowa Department of Corrections, Nick Ludwick, Stephen Sparks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bartnick v. Ludwick et al
as 4:2017cv00030
Plaintiff:
Michael A Bartnick
Defendant:
Nick Ludwick, William Sperfslage, Mark Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. McKinny et al
as 4:2016cv00646
Plaintiff:
Craig Eugene Smith
Defendant:
James McKinny, Kelly Holder, Leslie Wagers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
