Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Huntington Alloys Corporation v. Deutsche Nickel GMBH
as 3:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Huntington Alloys Corporation doing business as Special Metals
Defendant:
Deutsche Nickel GMBH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nickell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv10377
Plaintiff:
Tammy Nickell and Timothy Nickell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nickell et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29961
Plaintiff:
Barbara S. Nickell and John R. Nickell
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nickell et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv10725
Plaintiff:
Deborah Lynn Nickell and Christopher P. Nickell
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nickel v. American Medical Systems, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv06019
Plaintiff:
Sheri Jeanne Nickel
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems Holdings, Inc., Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nickell v. Delphi Automotive LLP
as 5:2012cv00079
Plaintiff:
Stacey R. Nickell , Robert Rice and Janne Rice
Defendant:
Delphi Automotive LLP, Delphi Automotive Systems LLC, Furukawa Electronic Co. Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
Nickell v. Insight Communications Company, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan et al
as 3:2010cv00821
Plaintiff:
Danny Nickell
Defendant:
Insight Communications Company, Inc. Long-Term Disability Plan, CIGNA Corporation, Life Insurance Company of North America and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Nickel v. Actavis Totowa LLC et al
as 2:2010cv00309
Defendant:
Actavis Totowa, LLC , Actavis, Inc. , Mylan, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Liane E. Nickel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
