Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Doe v. College of Eastern Idaho et al
as 4:2022cv00482
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
College of Eastern Idaho, College of Eastern Idaho Board of Trustees, Kathleen Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00269
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nielson v. United States of America et al
as 4:2016cv00216
Plaintiff:
Steve Nielson
Defendant:
United States of America and Bureau of Land Management
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2409
Schilling v. Panther et al
as 1:2016cv00168
Plaintiff:
Rodney Schilling
Defendant:
Paul Panther, Mark Kubinski, Leslie Hayes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Acosta v. Nielson et al
as 4:2015cv00101
Plaintiff:
Gwen Crutcher Acosta
Defendant:
Lorin - Nielson, Bannock County Sheriff's Office, Michaelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nielson v. Yordy
as 1:2014cv00236
Petitioner:
Dennis Nielson
Defendant:
Keith Yordy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newsome v. Reinke et al
as 1:2013cv00511
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ellis Newsome
Defendant:
Brent Reinke, Jay Nielson, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Conley v. Gray
as 4:2013cv00360
Plaintiff:
Shaun Patrick Conley
Defendant:
All Bannock County Detention Center staff, Nielson, Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf v. Otter et al
as 1:2013cv00212
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf
Defendant:
C.L. (Butch) Otter, Idaho State Board of Corrections, Robin Sandy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolf et al v. Otter et al
as 1:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Andrew J.J. Wolf, R Hans Kruger and David S Begley
Defendant:
C.L. Butch Otter, Lawrence Wasden, Idaho State Board of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
