Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Arrivas-Arcaina v. Amazon.com Services LLC
as 2:2023cv02961
Plaintiff:
Niko Arrivas-Arcaina
Defendant:
Amazon.com Services LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Libel, Assault, Slander
(PC) Ramirez v. KGET Channel 17 News
as 1:2023cv00737
Plaintiff:
Niko J. Ramirez
Defendant:
KGET Channel 17 News
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01990
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans w/ Disabilities Act (ADA)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv09314
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Niko Nichelle Housley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv01870
Plaintiff:
Niko Nichelle Housley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Daniel Salazar et al v. Rafaela T. King et al
as 2:2021cv06030
Plaintiff:
Daniel Salazar, Michael Shaw, Daniel Gomez and others
Defendant:
Rafaela T King, City of Compton, DOES 1 - 10 and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Coric v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv09115
Defendant:
eLiquitech, Inc., James Monsees, Altria Enterprises LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Niko Coric
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ketzler et al v. Faucher
as 1:2020at00216
Plaintiff:
Johannes Ketzler and Niko Groth
Defendant:
Robert Royal Faucher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ketzler, et al. v. Faucher
as 1:2020cv00430
Plaintiff:
Johannes Ketzler and Niko Groth
Defendant:
Robert Royal Faucher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
STJ Enterprise Inc. v. N&R Clothing Corp.et al
as 2:2020cv00942
Plaintiff:
STJ Enterprise Inc.
Defendant:
Ramin Nikravesh, N&R Clothing Corp.dba DeNiko dba BZ Studio dba De-Niko, DOES 1-10, inclusive and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
