Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Diaz v. Moore, et al.
as 24-2512
Plaintiff:
D. DIAZ
Defendant:
MICHEL REY MOORE, RICHARD ALARCON, RICHARD ALATORRE and others
Winterer v. No Named Defendant
as 23-3788
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JARED ANTHONY WINTERER
Defendant / Appellee:
NO NAMED DEFENDANT
Chavez v. Villanueva, et al.
as 23-3665
Plaintiff / Appellant:
N. CHAVEZ
Defendant / Appellee:
ALEJANDRO VILLANUEVA, Female Deputy GUERRERO and DOES, 10 Unknown Named Defendants
Al-Sadhan et al v. Twitter Inc. et al
as 4:2023cv02369
Defendant:
Ahmed Almutairi, Twitter Inc., Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and others
Plaintiff:
Areej Al-Sadhan and Abdulrahman Al-Sadhan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Daniel Boudette v. Tammy Oskerson, et al
as 22-36003
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL BOUDETTE
Defendant / Appellee:
TAMMY OSKERSON, ADAM OWENS, GREGORY G. COSTANZA and others
Boudette v. Oskerson et al
as 6:2022cv00071
Plaintiff:
Daniel Boudette
Defendant:
Tammy Oskerson, Adam Owens, Gregory Costanza and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
R. White v. USDC-CALA
as 22-70078
Not Classified By Court:
In re: R. WHITE, JACQUELINE SEABROOKS, GLEAM DAVIS and others
Petitioner:
R. WHITE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES
Stephen Yagman v. Robert Wunderlich, et al
as 21-56277
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN, as a representative of a class of persons who were charged exessive and extortionate fines by defendants
Defendant / Appellee:
ROBERT WUNDERLICH, LILI BOSSE, JOHN A. MIRISH and others
Stephen Yagman v. Jesse Bray, et al
as 21-55681
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRISTOPHER MARSHALL, UNKNOWN NAMED DEFENDANTS, 1-10, NATIONSTAR CAPITAL CORPORATION and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN
Stephen Yagman v. Eric Garcetti, et al
as 21-55453
Defendant / Appellee:
JASZMIN ORTEGA, JOSE HUIZAR, BRIAN SAM and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STEPHEN YAGMAN
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
