Cases 31 - 40 of 61
McDandal v. Liaw et al
as 3:2018cv00732
Plaintiff:
Nolan McDandal
Defendant:
Dr Liaw and Mr Harvil
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDandal v. Sevier et al
as 3:2018cv00606
Defendant:
Mrs Cornett, Mr Mark Sevier, Mrs Eldridge and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan McDandal
Undetermined:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BETTERTON v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2017cv01129
Plaintiff:
MYKEL NOLAN BETTERTON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
NOLAN v. COOK INCORPORATED
as 1:2016cv02845
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
ALICE NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Nolan v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
as 2:2016cv00328
Plaintiff:
Lois Nolan
Defendant:
American Family Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
NOLAN v. ELI LILLY & COMPANY
as 1:2016cv00042
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Plaintiff:
MYRNA NOLAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv02015
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BEARD et al v. ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
as 1:2015cv00922
Plaintiff:
YVETTE BEARD, JUDY BRANT, TERRY BROWN and others
Defendant:
ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv00474
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
