Cases 31 - 40 of 71
Nolan Management Company Inc v Maxum Indemnity Company
as 3:2019cv00644
Defendant:
Maxum Indemnity Company
Plaintiff:
Nolan Management Company Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allison v. Nolan County Jail
as 1:2018cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Allison
Defendant:
Nolan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allison v. Nolan County Jail
as 6:2018cv00008
Plaintiff:
Ronald Joseph Allison
Defendant:
Nolan County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolan County v. Purdue Pharma LP
as 1:2017cv00196
Plaintiff:
County of Nolan, TX
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma LP, Purdue Pharma Inc, The Purdue Frederick Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv01549
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Nolan v. Chandler
as 4:2016cv01053
Petitioner:
Jeffrey Vernon Nolan
Respondent:
Rodney Chandler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Bell v. Holeman et al
as 3:2016cv02220
Plaintiff:
Richard Nolan Bell
Defendant:
Evelyn L Bell Holeman, Gwendolyn J Bell and Valanderous W Bell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Daniel v. Watts et al
as 1:2016cv00056
Plaintiff:
Clayton Dean Daniel
Defendant:
Jerry Watts, Brenda Watts and Sheriff of Nolan County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ascendant Renewable Energy Corporation v. Soaring Wind Energy LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00750
Petitioner:
Ascendant Renewable Energy Corporation
Respondent:
Soaring Wind Energy LLC , Tang Energy Group Ltd , Keith P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010
Soaring Wind Energy LLC et al v. Catic USA Inc et al
as 3:2015cv04032
Plaintiff:
Soaring Wind Energy LLC , Tang Energy Group Ltd , The Nolan Group Inc and others
Defendant:
Catic USA Inc, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, China Aviation Industry General Aircraft Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
