Cases 61 - 70 of 150
Tia v. Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit et al
as 1:2017cv00303
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Head of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Thomas Doe, Canby Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Higgins et al
as 1:2017cv00284
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Marina Higgins, K. Tom, Jacob Feagai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brisken v. Mun et al
as 1:2017cv00283
Plaintiff:
Jhon Nigel Brisken
Defendant:
Wesley Mun and Nolan Espinda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety et al
as 1:2017cv00250
Plaintiff:
Thad Thompson
Defendant:
State of Hawaii Department of Public Safety, Halawa Correctional Facility and Nolan Uehara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia v. Uehara et al
as 1:2017cv00249
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia
Defendant:
Nolan Uehara, Jan Molina, Jacob Feagai and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tia et al v. Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) Mafia et al
as 1:2017cv00236
Plaintiff:
Peter R. Tia and Faleatafa E. Bentley
Defendant:
Halawa Correctional Facility (HCF) Mafia, Edward Vergara, Joyce K. Matsumori-Hoshijo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Santos
as 1:2017mc00149
Plaintiff:
Jon Freeman Eleu Santos
Defendant:
Hawaii, State of, Sheriff Division, Nolan Espinda and others
Cardines v. Espinda
as 1:2017cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kurt Russell Cardines
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v Espinda et al
as 1:2017cv00182
Plaintiff:
Michael Kaonohi Perry, Jr.
Defendant:
Nolan Espinda , Jodie Maesaka-Hirata , Peter Cabreros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jane Does 1-10 v. State of Hawaii; et al.
as 1:2017cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 , Jane Doe 2 , Jane Doe 3 and others
Defendant:
State of Hawaii, Nolan Espinda, Eric G. Tanaka and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
