Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Nordam Group, Inc. et al v. Wimmer
as 4:2020cv00413
Plaintiff:
Nordam Group, Inc. Welfare Benefit Plan, The and Nordam Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Kimberly Wimmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. v. The NORDAM Group, Inc.
as 1:2018cv04706
Plaintiff:
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp.
Defendant:
The NORDAM Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 27 U.S.C. § 185
Miller v. Nordam Group, Inc., The
as 4:2012cv00563
Plaintiff:
Sharon K Miller
Defendant:
Nordam Group, Inc., The
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617 Family & Medical Leave Act of 1993
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-5002
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
NORDAM Group Inc., The v. Cessna Aircraft Company, The
as 4:2011cv00244
Plaintiff:
NORDAM Group Inc., The
Defendant:
Cessna Aircraft Company, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Doyle v. The Nordam Group, Inc., et al
as 11-5004
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID M. DOYLE
Defendant - Appellee:
THE NORDAM GROUP, INC. and NORDAM TRANSPARENCY DIVISION OF TEXAS, INC
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00572
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Doyle v. Nordam Group, Inc., The et al
as 4:2009cv00531
Plaintiff:
David M Doyle, David M Doyle and David M Doyle
Defendant:
Nordam Group, Inc., The and Nordam Transparency Division of Texas, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Nordam Group Inc., The v. Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp. et al
as 4:2009cv00245
Plaintiff:
Nordam Group Inc., The and Nordam Group Inc., The
Defendant:
Pratt & Whitney Canada Corp., Jean Pierre Lair and Aeronautical Concept of Exhaust, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
