Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Laurie Williams v. Jason Collis
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
LAURIE WILLIAMS
Defendant:
JASON COLLIS and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Dennis Lafevers v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 14-1741
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS LAFEVERS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION
Gilbert Bynum v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
as 13-2127
Plaintiff - Appellee:
GILBERT BYNUM
Defendant - Appellant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Charles Harris v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 13-2026
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES EUGENE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CORPORATION
Third Party Defendant:
COBRA NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC and SPERRY RAIL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Sperry Rail Services
Charles Harris v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co
as 13-1975
Plaintiff - Appellee:
CHARLES EUGENE HARRIS
Defendant - Appellant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY CORPORATION
Third Party Defendant:
COBRA NATURAL RESOURCES, LLC and SPERRY RAIL, INCORPORATED, d/b/a Sperry Rail Services
Maleah Busbee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 12-1923
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALEAH BUSBEE
Plaintiff:
SARA OLVERA, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated, ABNER JOHNSON, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated, LILLIAN D. WITT, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated and others
Appellant:
DOUGLAS M. SCHMIDT
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Maleah Busbee v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 12-1247
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MALEAH BUSBEE
Plaintiff:
SARA OLVERA, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated, ABNER JOHNSON, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated, LILLIAN D. WITT, individually and as representative of a proposed class of others similarly situated and others
Petitioner:
KENNETH BELLINGER
Claimant:
EUGENE PENROW, JACOB IAN COURSEY, KEITH HUTTO and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Movant:
MIDWEST EMPLOYERS CASUALTY COMPANY, DEBORAH MORRIS, MICHAEL MORRIS and others
Darryl McKenzie v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 11-1365
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DARRYL MCKENZIE, MORRIS LAWN AND LANDSCAPE, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant:
WILLIAM HALL, DAISIAH WHACK, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant:
ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Jessica Curtis v. Norfolk Southern Railway Compa
as 10-1829
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD, JAMES SPLAWN and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant - Appellant:
DW, through her Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne; Guardian ad Litem Darlene Champagne, WILLIAM HALL, ROOSEVELT WALKER and others
Movant:
ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10
Elizabeth Cutright v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.
as 10-1559
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ELIZABETH R. CUTRIGHT, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Plaintiff:
TINA BEVINGTON, individually and on behalf of others similarly situated, JESSICA CURTIS, TIMOTHY ARD and others
Petitioner:
CHRISTY T. DALTON
Movant:
ROBERT M. BELL, ERWIN LEIZERMAN, MICHAEL J. LEIZERMAN and others
Defendant - Appellee:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and JOHN DOES 1-10, Norfolk Southern Railway Crewmembers and Residents of South Carolina
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
