Cases 61 - 70 of 109
LASLEY v. NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION et al
as 1:2012cv00016
Plaintiff:
ANDREW LASLEY
Defendant:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION and NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Pruden v. Kieffer Brothers Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01040
Plaintiff:
Randy Pruden
Defendant:
Kieffer Brothers Construction Company, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pruden v. Kieffer Brothers Construction Company, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01038
Plaintiff:
Randy Pruden
Defendant:
Kieffer Brothers Construction Company, Inc. and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00449
Plaintiff:
Michael Shaw
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Foltz v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 2:2011cv00389
Plaintiff:
Timothy Foltz
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company and Professional Transportation Inc
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Wiser v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv03378
Plaintiff:
William T. Wiser
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Coleman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2011cv00303
Plaintiff:
Mark Coleman
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Kelly v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00349
Plaintiff:
Lamonte E Kelly
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Holman v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00240
Plaintiff:
Jason Holman
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Crofoot v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Crofoot
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.