Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Smelser v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2013cv00936
Plaintiff:
Claude Smelser
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Stiltner v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 1:2013cv00458
Plaintiff:
Roy E. Stiltner
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Head et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 1:2013cv00129
Plaintiff:
Glenn R Head and Lori Head
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company , Invensys Rail Corporation and John Does 1-3
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henry v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2012cv01159
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey K Henry
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Deel v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2012cv00218
Plaintiff:
Martha Deel
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Harper v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
James W Harper
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Johnson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2012cv00012
Plaintiff:
Carol Johnson
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company , John Preston and Jane and John Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ratcliff v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2011cv01019
Plaintiff:
Robert Ratcliff
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Clausing v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2011cv00964
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Clausing
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Urdak v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2009cv00322
Plaintiff:
James G Urdak, James G Urdak and James G Urdak
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
