Cases 61 - 70 of 90
Crofoot v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2011cv00208
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Crofoot
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Eubanks v. Norfolk Southern Corporation et al
as 3:2011cv00135
Plaintiff:
Elaine Eubanks
Defendant:
David R Meier , Grand Elk Railroad Co and Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dohse v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 2:2011cv00099
Plaintiff:
Lyle Dohse
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Dipert v. Norfolk Southern Corporation
as 1:2011cv00050
Plaintiff:
Dean Dipert
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Mediator:
John W Whiteleather, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osborne v. CSX Corporation et al
as 4:2011cv00001
Plaintiff:
David Osborne
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Norfolk Southern Railway Company v. Pacmoore Products Inc
as 2:2010cv00340
Plaintiff:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Defendant:
Pacmoore Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 10101
Ball et al v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company et al
as 3:2010cv00177
Plaintiff:
James Ball and Angela Ball
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company, Professional Transportation Inc, Maureen Aldrich and others
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Craft v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00564
Plaintiff:
Evelyn G Craft
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY v. E-BIOFUELS, LLC
as 1:2009cv01095
Plaintiff:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY
Defendant:
E-BIOFUELS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1337 Sherman-Clayton Act
Clark v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2009cv00391
Plaintiff:
John R Clark and John R Clark
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
