Cases 21 - 30 of 35
Allen et al v. City of Chicago, The et al
as 1:2018cv00117
Plaintiff:
Willie Allen, Jr. and Wanda Norris
Defendant:
City of Chicago, The , Michael Wrobel , Michael Walsh, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbin v. Norris et al
as 1:2017cv08992
Plaintiff:
Brandon Harbin
Defendant:
T.M. Norris, B.M. Westcott and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Earl v. Howard et al
as 1:2017cv00243
Plaintiff:
Clyde Earl
Defendant:
Jonathan J. Howard , Steve Paschos , Tushar Advani and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. Baxter et al
as 1:2016cv08233
Plaintiff:
Garfield Phillips
Defendant:
Phyllis Baxter, Gayle Stricklin, Rose Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Norris v. Forest Preserve District of Will County et al
as 1:2016cv01016
Plaintiff:
Timothy Norris
Defendant:
Forest Preserve District of Will County, A. Paver, Officer Reilly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Norris v. City of Hometown et al
as 1:2015cv04692
Plaintiff:
Robert Norris
Defendant:
City of Hometown, Charles Forsyth and Kevin Casey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Schlueter et al
as 1:2014cv01251
Plaintiff:
Kenneth W Lewis
Defendant:
Norris Schlueter, Keith Schlueter, Amy Schlueter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1345
Norris et al v. Waterloo Park District et al
as 3:2014cv00323
Plaintiff:
Marla Norris and Scott Norris
Defendant:
Waterloo Park District and City of Waterloo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv02771
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Moore et al v. City Of Chicago et al
as 1:2013cv00483
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn Moore , Jaceta Smith and L. M.
Defendant:
City Of Chicago, The Chicago Police Department, Garry McCarthy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
