Cases filed in Mississippi
Cases 11 - 20 of 81
Long v. Burkes et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00416
Defendant: Lt. Unknown Jones, Warden Unknown Rice, Captain Unknown Jones and others
Interested Party: Pro Se Department
Plaintiff: Gary Long
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Armstrong v. Shaw et al
as 3:2018cv00379
Plaintiff: Anthony Armstrong
Defendant: Frank Shaw, Norris Hogan, D. Chapman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moore v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00308
Plaintiff: Ronald Moore
Defendant: Norris Hogan, D.H.O. Chapman and Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Hogan et al
as 3:2018cv00243
Plaintiff: Corey O'Neal Sims
Defendant: Norris Hogan, D. Chapman and Quincy Dukes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harbin v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00676
Plaintiff: Kunta Kinta Harbin
Defendant: Frank Shaw, Unknown Stewart, Unknown Townsen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Polk et al v. Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd. et al
as 1:2017cv00216
Plaintiff: Donna Polk , Charles Bowden , Alean Lampton and others
Defendant: Taishan Gypsum Co., Ltd., Tai'an Taishan Plasterboard Co., Ltd., Beijing New Building Materials Public Limited Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bennett v. Lee et al
as 4:2017cv00102
Plaintiff: Devin Bennett
Defendant: Earnest Lee, Timothy Morris, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00378
Plaintiff: Corey Barnett
Defendant: Frank Shaw, Norris Hogans, Richard Cooney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bias v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00256
Plaintiff: Orlando James Bias
Defendant: Frank Shaw, Norris Hogan, K. Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Shaw et al
as 3:2017cv00170
Plaintiff: Corey Barnett
Defendant: Frank Shaw, Norris Hogans, Unknown Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?