Cases 1 - 10 of 22
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS et al v. U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY et al
as 1:2023cv03605
Plaintiff:
ASSOCIATION OF WASHINGTON BUSINESS, NORTHWEST PULP & PAPER ASSOCIATION, AMERICAN FOREST & PAPER ASSOCIATION and others
Defendant:
U.S. ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and MICHAEL S. REGAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
ALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM et al v. HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2023cv03252
Plaintiff:
ALBANY MED HEALTH SYSTEM, ALBANY MEDICAL CENTER HOSPITAL, COLUMBIA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL and others
Defendant:
HEALTH RESOURCES AND SERVICES ADMINISTRATION, CAROLE JOHNSON, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
NORTHWEST WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION v. SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION et al
as 1:2022cv00613
Plaintiff:
NORTHWEST WASHINGTON FAIR ASSOCIATION
Defendant:
SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION and ISABELLA CASILLAS GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF THE CHEHALIS RESERVATION et al v. MNUCHIN
as 1:2020cv01002
Plaintiff:
TULALIP TRIBES, HOULTON BAND OF MALISEET INDIANS, AKIAK NATIVE COMMUNITY and others
Defendant:
STEVEN MNUCHIN
Intervenor Defendant:
NAPASKIAK, INCORPORATED, ALASKA NATIVE VILLAGE CORPORATION ASSOCIATION, INC., CALISTA CORPORATION and others
Amicus Curiae:
NATIVE AMERICAN FINANCE OFFICERS ASSOCIATION, GILA RIVER INDIAN COMMUNITY, AFFILIATED TRIBES OF NORTHWEST INDIANS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
WESTROCK COMPANY et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00482
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
WESTROCK SOUTHEAST, LLC, WESTROCK VIRGINIA, LLC, WESTROCK COMPANY OF CANADA CORP./COMPAGNIE WESTROCK DU CANADA CORP. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
ALCOA CORPORATION et al v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY et al
as 1:2020cv00375
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
Plaintiff:
INTALCO ALUMINUM, LLC, NORTHWEST ALLOYS, INC., ALUMAX MILL PRODUCTS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
as 1:2020mc00008
Plaintiff:
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY, NORTHERN INDIANA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY LLC, AK STEEL CORPORATION and others
Defendant:
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC., NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY and others
In Re:
RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION (NO. II)- MDL NO. 2925
Interested Party:
NORFOLK SOUTHERN CORPORATION, UNION PACIFIC CORPORATION, CVR ENERGY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT v. UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
as 1:2019cv03283
Plaintiff:
NORTHWEST IMMIGRANT RIGHTS PROJECT
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT et al v. UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
as 1:2018cv00796
Plaintiff:
ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT , CLEAN WATER ACTION , ENVIRONMENT AMERICA and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2017cv02325
Plaintiff:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, MARIA DE LA CRUZ PERALES SANCHEZ and others
Defendant:
DUKE C. ELAINE, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and others
Amicus Curiae:
CAPITAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE, HAMPSHIRE COLLEGE, MASSACHUSETTS LAW REFORM INSTITUTE (MLRI) and others
Petitioner:
SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER, BAR ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO, CUNY DREAMERS and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
